[Phase 1] HIP 58 - Removal of vouchallengers

[NingFid]

@ludovico

Challenges to the removal of a vouchallenger should be ruled against the challenger in cased of a dispute or, as an alternative, challenge to such removals (of the vouchallenger) should provide evidence that the holder of the vouchallenged person received consent from the vouched person of such act.

The motivation of this proposal is good but the procedure for penalizing vouchallengers is better below:

Preventing vouchallenges while incentivizing a web of trust

Disclaimer: This post aims to open a discussion. In a future, a formal HIP should be crafted. This discussion also assumes that Proof of Humanity will be deployed, along with Kleros, in an L2 solution, so I suggest to avoid thinking in high fees and other problems related to Ethereum L1. Preventing vouchallenges while incentivizing a web of trust Currently vouching a profile has almost no consequences. This has a negative aspect (like vouchallenges, that will be introduced in a moment) and a k…