So to give context to this accusation:
On the demand of another member Santi submitted a proposal on the official page.
The proposal stated that whoever voted for it will be added as a Snapshot proposer.
This proposal did not follow HIP-5.
This proposal did not allow people to vote against (there was no “make no change” option).
It lead to people being confused and someone asking me why she was unable to make proposals despite having voted on the proposal.
As HIP-34 stated
- The main snapshot page is reserved for official proposals (following HIP-5 and its possible amendments).
As HIP-7 stated that mission board members are responsible of:
- Technical implementation of voting
- Any resource requiring high trust by the community
I talked with Santi who agreed that the proposal was indeed invalid. He asked me to inform people before removing it.
I informed people on telegram (advising to use a new polling space if they want to make non-enforcing polls) and removed the proposal.
Luis then accused me of censoring the proposal, then argued that it wasn’t a proposal.