Apoyo esta idea. Necesitamos aclarar formalmente los grupos donde la DAO se vea representada. El grupo anterior nunca fue propiedad de la misma.
Junto con esto, también legitimizaria las cuentas de Twitter: @pohdao como Twitter internacional, y @pohdaoenespanol como Twitter de habla hispana.
Además de nuestro servidor de discord.
Cabe aclarar que todos los grupos deberían seguir los códigos de conducta ya establecidos, cómo también las formas de gobernanza. (Admin, mod, etc)
In order to “officialize” communication channels, there should be a registry that states this, that is actually OWNED by the DAO.
Here is a proposal for Phase 3 to make a real legitimization of communication channels:
PohCommunicationChannels.sol
ownable and ownership should be given to the PoH Governor (which is the only SC that actually represents THE DAO)This way, communication channels are officialized ON CHAIN, given that any change to the registry requires a modification through the GOVERNOR (using HIPs)
Will be added to phase 3
So you mean that groups you control should be the official ones instead of the ones that are administrated by the board?
Currently the situation is clear, no group follows HIP-16. If one does, I will support it being designated as official but before that it just looks like a power grab by the group owner.
Is there any clarification on how the Twitter accounts and groups will be managed? Ownership, moderators, people with access to posting…
It really does feel rushed to vote this HIP without having more clarification.
Also, why not just add a list of groups that are official, and include the ones managed by the MB?
Estoy de acuerdo con el primer punto.
Creo que en fase 3 se podría aclarar la situación de las redes para que tambien sea consensuado por la DAO.
I will not further pursue this HIP. Anyone who wants to continue with it, feel free to do so.
No continuaré con esta HIP. Quien quiera seguir empujandola, que se sienta libre de hacerlo.
I see the proposal being put to vote without addressing any of these concerns. It’s definitely being rushed, and that’s detrimental to the DAO.
For example:
Another detail:
“Change to the official comm channels including the front-end maintained by the dao to the following Address in Telegram:”
Currently the only front-end is maintained by Kleros. Wouldn’t it be better if each party hosting and maintained front-ends could decide which telegram groups / twitter accounts they can point to?
So I’ve looked at the channel owners and administrators.
@proofofhumanityDAOes
Is owned by Santi and has Luis (the proposal author) as administrator.
@proofofhumanityDAOen
Is owned by Luis and has Santi, Leti, and Mati as administrators.
Who owns?
@pohDAO and pohDAOenespanol
Here it looks like the proposal creator after having removed board members administration right in the main channels and gotten himself removed after that is trying to get back control of them by asking the DAO to declare legitimate the channels that he himself owns and administer.
“In link to those illegal promotions, I removed Shin (elected board member) and Clément (elected board member and project founder). No more illegal actions.” - Luis
Moreover there is no info on who owns the Twitter accounts.
Also those accounts are administrated without any neutrality, for example
Moreover, this @pohDAO is mainly tweeting in Spanish and not in English. What is the point of having multiple Spanish accounts and no English ones?
Since those accounts are not neutral and the ownership of half of them is unknown, I voted against.
Also to give context to this proposal, someone had maliciously accessed the main twitter account to Tweet this:
So it looks like the authors after illegally getting access to the main Twitter account but failed to keep it are trying to get the DAO to bless their accounts.
This reply is in the wrong phase, replying in the Phase 3 Post.
