Challenges and removals - ¿it's always fair?

[ludovico]

There is at least two that I have authored, one moving to phase 3 and another in phase 1.

HIP-8 [Phase-2]: Accept 352 as width in vertical video submissions

Simple summary Make clear that the definition of 360p does not literally mean 360 pixels, and that certain codecs crop 4 pixels from each side of the image. Submissions with 352 pixels wide should not be considered in violation with submission rules. Abstract This amendment proposal is a fast, immediate solution to issues related to a widespread method of video submission… It moves the minimum dimension of the width of vertical videos from 360 to 352 to match what is currently capable in the …

And

HIP-9 [Phase-1]: Require registered users to challenge profiles

Simple summary You wouln’t let a foreign country fiddle with your justice system. Abstract At the moment, any wallet can challenge submissions to the registry. Although it is true that there is the need to include as much people possible to watch over the integrity of the registry, this creates a lack of transparency of the challenging process and creates a gap in which high-PNK holders can collude with bad actors, challenging profiles that have a gray area and influence in the outcome in ord…