HIP-5 upgrade discussion thread / Hilo de discusión sobre la actualización de la HIP-5

Proof of Humanity
1

This thread will be to try to have a fruitful discussion that with luck, will lead to a Phase 1 of a HIP that will upgrade and amend the HIP-5 functionality.
We can use the recent experiences in governance to explore what went right and what went wrong in previous instances of the HIP 5 framework.

For starters, some questions that will trigger the debate:

  • Is HIP-5 properly defined?
  • Is the time-frame for new HIPs adequate?
  • Is the overall procedure clear and free of different interpretations?

Este hilo servirá para intentar mantener un debate fructífero que, con suerte, desemboque en la fase 1 de un HIP que actualice y modifique la funcionalidad del HIP-5.
Podemos utilizar las experiencias recientes en materia de gobernanza para explorar lo que salió bien y lo que salió mal en las instancias anteriores del marco HIP 5.

Para empezar, algunas preguntas que desencadenarán el debate:

  • ¿Está bien definido el HIP-5?
  • ¿Es adecuado el plazo para los nuevos PIS?
  • ¿Es el procedimiento general claro y libre de diferentes interpretaciones?
2

I think it’s interesting that a variable of the Phase voting process is open up for debate. We could do an amendment HIP to HIP 5 where we can vote the length of the Phase 2 Signalling polls.

On the other hand, I think that all HIPs previously voted were regarded as valid by the community as a whole. This issue arising now shouldn’t impact the perception of that and, if necessary, the Mission Board can issue a recommendation about this (as per HIP 7).

3 Likes
3

in any healthy democracy. the subject of. the retroactivity of the law is very important, it must be clear that HIPs cannot be. retroactive, except for specific exceptions