I’ve seen many cases of vouchers clearly not reviewing profiles before giving them their vouch.
I.e. registrations vouched with videos with a completely different eth address.
Since this has a severe impact in the quality of submissions and also represents a substantial economic loss for the human which by mistake sent an incorrect submission. I believe stronger incentives should be put in place to increase voucher responsibility.
So, following the criteria of removing voucher profiles who vouch for malicious registrations, what about temporarily (lets say, for a week) lowering/stopping the accruing rate for vouchers who vouched for a human that has been removed for incorrect submission?
I believe this, together with properly explaining it in the UI, would definitely incentivize better scrutiny from vouchers to vouchees prior to giving it.