Hey! That’s indeed me, very cool that you found out.
I did this to show the vulnerability that currently exists. It’s pretty unfair but the system allows it.
I decided to do it in pos of this proposal [Phase 1] HIP-12: Let users decide to "Accept" vouches when your profile is in vouching phase that it’s getting actually objected.
I wanna make the point that we are allowing many extra interests to occur besides the principal that is identity verification, if we want to let this be useful for everyone we have to make it the most fair to use. I would love to see this network of humans as fair and resilient as possible. Even if I have to serve as the “black hat” and easily reachable hacker ( the worst in humanity )
I want to see how the Kleros court reacts and how fair the result is. My friend’s result on the case described in my proposal was costly and very unfair, they denied the profile even after showing new evidence, but there was no discussion at the moment, I believe the court is very black and white in decisions and they are losing the point of curating properly the humanity of people.
I decided to not do it anonymously and make the discussion more public, I’m happy and excited you found it because we can get to talk about it, unlike my friend’s case I couldn’t blame it to anyone ( I believe there’s also a proposal around there to only allow challenges from humans )
Now let’s debate!
Remove the part that it’s me and it was someone anonymous instead, what’s the difference between this action and the one rejected to my friend, some unknown gave him the vouch and then someone challenged. If the Kleros court is always going to be black and white on decisions like this then we can make a stronger system by adding the vouch acceptance which I’m proposing. The other option is to make the court’s guidelines more fair for the system. We want a network of real people, mistakes are the most human thing, so is the goal to curate that or just slashing profiles like robots?
I’m very interested in seeing how this develop. And again, my objective with this is to make our system more resilient and fair. Not to win/lose money or catch a fight
EDIT: By the way. I forgot to address the status change to pending. I’m not aware if the action is blocked for only humans or not, but anyway I did it to move fast and be more obvious. No other reason
EDIT2: Anyone can actually speed up the pending stage, so the ‘attacker’ could have also done it anonymously